Skip to content

candid vs resolute

Topic: Writing to thank a mentor who shaped your career
Axis varied: tone
A: Candid B: Resolute

Both examples address the same topic and (by default) share every axis other than tone. The only deliberate variable is which tone the writing was rendered through. Read both and ask: where does the framing change? Where does the vocabulary change? What does the reader take away from A that they would not take away from B, and vice versa? The tone swap is the entire cause of those differences.

A: candid

Dana,

I want to be honest with you about something I should have said years ago.

When you put me forward to lead the Vickers account rollout in 2014, I was not ready. I knew it then, and I suspect you knew it too. I spent the first two weeks quietly panicking, second-guessing every decision, and wondering whether you had miscalculated or just made a mistake. I did not tell you that at the time. I managed my discomfort privately while you managed yours outwardly - checking in without hovering, asking questions that nudged me toward my own thinking rather than giving me yours.

That restraint had a cost. I can see it now because I spent the last three months doing the same thing with Priya on the platform migration. She was not ready either. Watching her find her footing when I could have just taken over - that required patience I did not know I had. And when I traced where I learned that particular skill, it went straight back to you.

Here is the honest picture: what you gave me was not just confidence. It was the experience of being trusted when I had not yet earned it, and the model of what it looks like to develop someone without rescuing them. Both of those things are still in operation in how I work.

I am writing because I think you deserve to know that it landed. Not just in a vague “you shaped my career” way, but specifically, in a way I can point to. You passed something forward. I wanted you to know I received it.

B: resolute

Dana,

I am writing because I know now what you did, and I am not going to let another year pass without saying so.

Three weeks ago I put Kenji on a project he did not feel ready for. I watched him spend the first two weeks in that particular stillness that looks like calm but is actually a person deciding whether to stay or run. I checked in daily. I answered what he asked and left alone what he did not ask. And when it worked - when he found his footing and carried it - I sat with that feeling for a while before I recognized it. It was yours.

You did this for me ten years ago. The Harmon migration project. You told the steering committee I would lead it before you told me, and then you stood there while I processed that information at your desk. You did not take it back. You also did not leave me alone with it - you were there every week, asking the questions that helped me think rather than the ones that told me what to do. That cost you something. I know that now in a way I could not have known it then. Patience is not passive. Staying present without taking over is harder than taking over.

What you made possible is the thing I am passing on. Kenji is going to be excellent. That is not luck and it is not me - it is a method I learned from watching you hold the line on someone’s capability when they could not yet hold it themselves.

Thank you. I am carrying it forward.

  • Marcus