Showcase

The fastest way to know whether this is for you is to watch it work. Below, three people take real, hard decisions through the frameworks - the exact prompt they typed, and the full artifact it produced. No teasers; the whole output is on the page.

The cast spans the library’s range on purpose: an individual deciding fast, a team decision with technical consequences, and a deliberation with ethical stakes run by hand.

Browse by person

Mira, startup founder (casual prompts)

Recurring high-stakes calls under uncertainty, usually solo, usually fast.

• Where do I even start? - she describes the mess to the advisor and gets a Thinking Plan.
• Reframe a hiring decision - “who do I hire” becomes “what capability are we missing.”
• Premortem a launch - a one-line prompt yields a ranked risk register with tripwires and kill criteria.
• Choose between two pricing models - the full stress-test-a-decision recipe: three chained artifacts.
• Stress-test a pivot - what would have to be true, sorted by what she can test cheaply.

Daniel, senior engineer (organized prompts)

Technical and architectural decisions with cross-team consequences.

• Trace a recurring bug - rival causes adjudicated by the diagnostic weight of the evidence.
• Map an underperforming system - the feedback loops behind a queue that keeps growing.
• Challenge a load-bearing assumption - the inference chain from raw data to “rip out the cache.”
• Choose between three architectures - a weighted scoring table with an honest sensitivity note.
• Map a migration’s consequences - first, second, and third-order effects.
• Audit the reasoning in a proposal - the audit-reasoning recipe: evidence-vs-inference, then an argument map.

Priya, policy analyst (detailed prompts, run by hand)

Decisions with ethical dimensions and public accountability, often worked on paper.

• Map stakeholders before a policy - the ethical matrix, filled in by hand.
• Deliberate a values trade-off by hand - the clearest “you do not need an agent” demonstration.
• Audit the argument in a proposal - the load-bearing premise made explicit.
• Record a decision before a public commitment - a journal entry built for later calibration.
• Work a contested docket - the issue-position-argument recipe across many conflicting comments.

Browse by what you want to produce

You need…	See
A ranked risk register	Mira premortems a launch
A weighted option matrix	Daniel chooses an architecture
A reframed problem	Mira reframes a hire
An argument map	Priya audits a proposal
A stakeholder trade-off grid	Priya maps a policy
A full chained decision	Mira’s pricing recipe, Priya’s docket recipe

Then what?

Every artifact above came from one prompt. To write your own, see the Prompt Gallery (the same prompts in three styles) and the operating guide, Using the frameworks. Not sure which framework fits your situation? Describe it to the Framework Advisor.